Pages

Showing posts with label political correctness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political correctness. Show all posts

Monday, August 1, 2011

Angry Enough to Write

by Susan Cameron

I was going to write something new specifically for Tasty Sauce, but once again I got caught up in Inspector Gadget's blog. This time the topic was a 6-year-old gypsy girl named Dawn being repeatedly raped by her father. Dawn's mother had been given to Dawn's father by HER father as payment for a debt. The police had removed Dawn and turned her over to Social Services; the Crown Prosecution Service said there wasn't enough evidence to convict her father; Social Services put her back in the house. More cops with more horror stories chimed in. Bear with me:

* * * * * * * * * *

163 said on July 31 @2:43: "A long time ago, it would have been 1994 or 1995, I found a kid, about two years old, at a house where a drug dealer had been in a fight with another drug dealer. With an axe. There was claret and syringes everywhere. Mum, who was a tom with an epic crack habit, was wandering around in a main road with the baby.

I took the kid into police protection. The world went mad. Like I was some sort of lunatic. I was in my twenties and gave a shit. The social worker, who released the kid back into the mum’s custody sharpish, told me “not to project my middle class values” onto the family. First time I’d been told I was middle class, funnily enough, because my avowedly working class parents would have done exactly the same thing."

(my response)

This got me thinking about a man long ago who projected his supposedly "middle class values" and didn't feel the least bit ashamed of it.

General William Napier, an administrator during the Raj, had this to say to the Indians about the practice of suttee, according to Wikipedia:

"This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs."

My understanding is that suttee pretty much disappeared on Napier's watch.

Hanging has gone out of fashion, but wouldn't it be nice if the Prime Minister and Members of Parliament collectively said:

"The raping of children is your custom, as is trading and selling female relatives as property, and robbery, and burglary, and mayhem. But our nation has also a custom. We arrest, try, convict and sentence to prison anyone caught doing any of those things. We shall therefore begin a prison-building project, and keep you in those prisons until you are long past breeding age. Let us all act according to our customs. And, by the way, you might want to leave while you still can."

But, no. If anything, our leaders have spent the last few decades apologizing for western civilization's rules, laws, customs and expectations, not defending them. You know what I'd really like to hear, just once?

"Listen up. I'm supposed to respect your cultural differences, but you don't actually have anything resembling a culture. I could find a superior culture growing in the tank of a portajohn in the Mojave desert in August. You have the human compassion and morality of a rabid wolverine. I don't care about your thoughts and opinions any more -- I ate a bowl of corn flakes this morning that was smarter than you. Here's the deal. We have a pile of laws, most of which are variations on this theme: Do unto others as you would have them do unto to you. This is the one sentence that separates civilization from barbarism. Violate this fundamental principal, and we will remove you from our civilization. Got it? Don't worry. If you don't get it, you will understand SOON."

Okay. I'm stepping away from the keyboard. I believe there is another glass of pinot with my name on it in the kitchen. Apologies for the length of the comment, but I swear, it's either post this, or blow up at random like a badly wired IED. Thanks in advance for your tolerance.

* * * * * * * * * *

And now I thank you for yours. It's too bad something has to make me angry enough to write, but if that's the rocket fuel I need, so be it!

copyright Susan Cameron 2011

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

How I Spent A Chunk Of My Tuesday

by Susan Cameron

Monday, the Fourth of July, was loads of fun -- food, friends, fireworks in Dana Point -- so here's my post, late because of the holiday. (That's my story and I'm sticking to it).


I read many, many (MANY!) things on the internet. One blog I follow belongs to Inspector Gadget, nom de plume of an anonymous police inspector who would be fired for blogging if he were caught. He wrote a post about a female police officer in Britain who sued her force, and won, after she failed a fitness test: https://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/police-riot-training-fitness-test-to-be-scrapped/ and I felt compelled to comment:

I read the original post and all 405 comments. Bad idea — I’m now a combination of appalled, sad, and above all, angry.

When my sister went through the police academy here in the states, it was run in a gender-blind military fashion. The training was physically and mentally intense, and all recruits were held to the same high standards. She was paired up with men of similar height and weight for the street fighting training and boxing, ran up and down the same six flights of stairs as the men did, needed the same high scores on the firing range, etc. The washout rate of both genders was high. I was so proud when I attended her graduation, and stayed proud as she rose through the ranks as the years went by. Because everyone in her force was required to stay fit and qualified, there was never any doubt that she belonged there and deserved to have her job. (This didn’t stop some fellow officers from hating the women’s guts just on general principles, of course).

Anyhow, as Fee said: “Well done, that woman. She’s succeeded in setting back the cause of equality no end. My mother’s generation fought to be judged equally, and to earn the same wage for the same work. Not so that lazy cows could sue an already skint police force because she (boo hoo, lovey) couldn’t cut the mustard.” Absolutely. Anybody who can’t do the job, shouldn’t have the job. Standards need to be met. Demanding special treatment demeans the others who CAN do the job and don’t need or want special treatment. If this particular constable was deliberately misinformed and set up by enemies within her force who wanted to see her humiliated, she should be embarrassed that she didn’t see it coming. She should have been fit, ready, locked and loaded and waiting for the sons of bitches.

One last thing. From the memory banks when I worked on a road crew:

Foreman: You’re working out real good. I was a little worried about hiring you, because we had a woman grade checker once, and she didn’t work out at all.

Me: Did you ever have a man who didn’t work out?

Foreman: Yeah, sure.

Me: Did you stop hiring men?

Foreman:……(laugh)…..Damn it, Susie!

Anyhow, folks, this is what I'm doing when I ought to be writing. Wait...I AM writing! LOL! Feel free to comment, and you'll be writing too! :)

copyright 2011, Susan Cameron